Difference between revisions of "Talk:Migration Geohash"
imported>UnwiseOwl m (Spelling is not my strong point) |
imported>Robyn (Should it stay then?) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
-- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 04:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC) | -- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 04:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That's what I mean, it's an achievement that no one is going to get unless they live in San Francisco or Boston. No one has wanted to even make a page for it. It's not inspiring anyone. Every time I look at the red link and try to make a page for it I just think "meh." It would be migration if you met the fifty people in different graticules. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:35, 30 October 2008
Okay, this achievement has been listed on the main page for a long time and no one has wanted it or made a page for it. That's because no one thinks they'll ever see 50 people at a geohash.
So should we delete it, or change it to meeting 50 geohashers, cumulatively, one at a time if necessary? -Robyn 03:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Well, that wouldn't be migration. I figure this could only happen if the hash occurred at a major event, and the count included non-hashers. I like the idea of a meeting hashers award, but see it as something quite different to this.
Hashers in my grat:3
Hashers I've met:1 (It was me)
-- UnwiseOwl 04:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
That's what I mean, it's an achievement that no one is going to get unless they live in San Francisco or Boston. No one has wanted to even make a page for it. It's not inspiring anyone. Every time I look at the red link and try to make a page for it I just think "meh." It would be migration if you met the fifty people in different graticules. -Robyn 04:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
