Difference between revisions of "File talk:-35 139 11102008 UO31.jpg"
From Geohashing
imported>Ekorren (Just like most of the rest of the wildlife category...) |
imported>Ilpadre |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Aren't those domestic sheep? I don't see the wildlife. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 19:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC) | Aren't those domestic sheep? I don't see the wildlife. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 19:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Domestic animals seem generally to have ended up in the wildlife category. This is why some people want to rename it into "Animals" or break it up into two categories. Yet, the general way to deal with it seems to be to ignore the apparent inappropriateness. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 10:35, 15 May 2009 (UTC) | :Domestic animals seem generally to have ended up in the wildlife category. This is why some people want to rename it into "Animals" or break it up into two categories. Yet, the general way to deal with it seems to be to ignore the apparent inappropriateness. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 10:35, 15 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I'd say: Put everything wild into the wildlife category, for domestic animals create an appropriate category and put them there - "Cats", "Sheep", "Horses" etc. --[[User:Ilpadre|ilpadre]] 12:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:20, 15 May 2009
Aren't those domestic sheep? I don't see the wildlife. -Robyn 19:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Domestic animals seem generally to have ended up in the wildlife category. This is why some people want to rename it into "Animals" or break it up into two categories. Yet, the general way to deal with it seems to be to ignore the apparent inappropriateness. --Ekorren 10:35, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'd say: Put everything wild into the wildlife category, for domestic animals create an appropriate category and put them there - "Cats", "Sheep", "Horses" etc. --ilpadre 12:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
