Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wiki Conventions"
From Geohashing
imported>Ciel (proposed convention) |
imported>Danatar |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Most graticule pages seem to contain 1) Local Geohashers, 2) Recent Points, and 3) Upcoming Points. I think we should encourage each graticule page to adopt these as the first three sections - it provides nice consistency, and allows outside apps to provide these data by tapping into the wiki. | Most graticule pages seem to contain 1) Local Geohashers, 2) Recent Points, and 3) Upcoming Points. I think we should encourage each graticule page to adopt these as the first three sections - it provides nice consistency, and allows outside apps to provide these data by tapping into the wiki. | ||
Hashpoint pages could have just have a description, people who attended, and a photo gallery. - [[User:Ciel|ciel]] May 25, 2008, 23:13. | Hashpoint pages could have just have a description, people who attended, and a photo gallery. - [[User:Ciel|ciel]] May 25, 2008, 23:13. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :What about a) Link to peeron, b) About, c) Local Geohashers, d) Neighboring Graticule Geohashers, e) Expeditions, f) Upcoming Hashpoints/Planning, g) Useful links (public transport schedules...). [[User:Danatar|Danatar]] 22:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:14, 4 October 2008
Proposed Conventions
Most graticule pages seem to contain 1) Local Geohashers, 2) Recent Points, and 3) Upcoming Points. I think we should encourage each graticule page to adopt these as the first three sections - it provides nice consistency, and allows outside apps to provide these data by tapping into the wiki. Hashpoint pages could have just have a description, people who attended, and a photo gallery. - ciel May 25, 2008, 23:13.
- What about a) Link to peeron, b) About, c) Local Geohashers, d) Neighboring Graticule Geohashers, e) Expeditions, f) Upcoming Hashpoints/Planning, g) Useful links (public transport schedules...). Danatar 22:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
