Difference between revisions of "Talk:Games we play"
From Geohashing
imported>Joannac (+1) |
imported>Relet m (Talk:Games We Play moved to Talk:Games we play: Naming conventions) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:::I think one of each game should be fine. The Canberrans made up a card game, but no photos :( Will try and hassle psud about it. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 22:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC) | :::I think one of each game should be fine. The Canberrans made up a card game, but no photos :( Will try and hassle psud about it. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 22:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I'll keep the Sydney one, then. Can see the cards better. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 23:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:41, 19 October 2009
Hi Robyn, here is another, Fluxx!
2008-07-27 -33 151 game in fluxx.JPG
I didn't want to mess up your pretty formatting! Kate 21:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sure! No reason not to have Fluxx twice. -Robyn 22:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Uh, Robyn, do you want multiples of games, or would you prefer to keep approximately one of each game? Either way, when I get around to uploading, I shall contribute. - UnwiseOwl 22:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, due to my inability to read, I didn't realise you had Fluxx already! Should we just keep it at one of each game? Kate 22:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
