Difference between revisions of "Talk:New York, New York"
imported>Swampfriend (→Tools for random points in/near the city only?) |
imported>Jevanyn |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
The .5 Rule: if the latitude right of the decimal is less than .5, then add .5 to the number. --[[User:Harris|Harris]] 16:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | The .5 Rule: if the latitude right of the decimal is less than .5, then add .5 to the number. --[[User:Harris|Harris]] 16:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:There is a lot of ocean in this graticule, so an [[:Category:Alternate algorithm|Alternate algorithm]] is justifyable. -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 15:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC) | :There is a lot of ocean in this graticule, so an [[:Category:Alternate algorithm|Alternate algorithm]] is justifyable. -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 15:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::In general, alternate algorithms have never caught on. -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] ([[User talk:Jevanyn|talk]]) 10:20, 21 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
:Another suggestion, which is more NYC-friendly: Rather than prepending "40" and "-73", prepend "40.7" and "73.9". This is a [[decicule]] that is mostly land: it includes the bulk of Manhattan, a good part of Queens and Brooklyn, and a smidgen of New Jersey. I'm interested in a meetup this spring/summer, so let me know if an [[:Category:Alternate algorithm|Alternate algorithm]] is in effect? -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 19:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | :Another suggestion, which is more NYC-friendly: Rather than prepending "40" and "-73", prepend "40.7" and "73.9". This is a [[decicule]] that is mostly land: it includes the bulk of Manhattan, a good part of Queens and Brooklyn, and a smidgen of New Jersey. I'm interested in a meetup this spring/summer, so let me know if an [[:Category:Alternate algorithm|Alternate algorithm]] is in effect? -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 19:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::At least ~40% of this graticule's hashes should be on land. If people are disinclined to attempt hashes just because they're inconvenient or difficult to reach, I'd consider that more a failing of the people than the algorithm. --[[User:Eldin|Eldin]] ([[User talk:Eldin|talk]]) 20:04, 24 October 2013 (EDT) | ||
+ | :::It's closer to 25%, if you account for Long Island Sound, etc. Also, [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWdd6_ZxX8c]. |
Revision as of 14:20, 21 August 2014
Transportation
Only you city folks are without cars. Pretty much everyone in the Nassau has access to a car assuming they have a license. However, because you live in NYC, you have access to brilliant public transportation. Meaning: Take the subway to Penn and then the train out to the Island if needed. And you know, ride a bike or something. Long Island isn't prohibitively big if you take trains/buses/riding a bicycle into consideration. NoOneButMe 00:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Also, its not a valid reason to say the algorithm is broken in any way imo. While the city has a bunch of places to explore, the point is (as i see it) for spontaneity in meeting places, not to create preordained meeting places that are grouped around a similar location every week. NoOneButMe 01:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, the algorithm isn't broken (except that there is a lot of water, see below). We should take local culture into account, that's all. A lot of XKCD fans are college-age, and may not have a car anyway. -- Jevanyn 15:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- For those of you who are financially able, might I suggest Zipcar? I have an account and it's really useful if you only need a car for a few hours or a day, and they're parked all over the city. Not trying to be a shill, or anything, but I know I'll be using it to make geohashing a wee bit easier when it drops outside of the realm of public transportation and isn't in the water. --Marco 20:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Water
We had an awesome time on the water today. I took my kayak for two (you know, the one that travels through time) out to today's location. It was a blast. See you next time.
P.S. I only come to meetings at locations only accessible via Google Maps (Particularly, the blue squares).
--HockeyInJune 02:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Too Much Water
Since over half of our graticule is water, I suggest a new rule for determining a meeting point:
The .5 Rule: if the latitude right of the decimal is less than .5, then add .5 to the number. --Harris 16:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- There is a lot of ocean in this graticule, so an Alternate algorithm is justifyable. -- Jevanyn 15:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Another suggestion, which is more NYC-friendly: Rather than prepending "40" and "-73", prepend "40.7" and "73.9". This is a decicule that is mostly land: it includes the bulk of Manhattan, a good part of Queens and Brooklyn, and a smidgen of New Jersey. I'm interested in a meetup this spring/summer, so let me know if an Alternate algorithm is in effect? -- Jevanyn 19:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- At least ~40% of this graticule's hashes should be on land. If people are disinclined to attempt hashes just because they're inconvenient or difficult to reach, I'd consider that more a failing of the people than the algorithm. --Eldin (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2013 (EDT)
- It's closer to 25%, if you account for Long Island Sound, etc. Also, [1].
- At least ~40% of this graticule's hashes should be on land. If people are disinclined to attempt hashes just because they're inconvenient or difficult to reach, I'd consider that more a failing of the people than the algorithm. --Eldin (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2013 (EDT)