Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Tagged for deletion"
From Geohashing
imported>Joannac m (→Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion: +1) |
imported>Joannac (→Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion: +1.5) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*HOLY CRAP [[http://wiki.xkcd.com/geohashing/World]] | *HOLY CRAP [[http://wiki.xkcd.com/geohashing/World]] | ||
:Yeah, that was created by some avid (anonymous? I don't remember) scripter.. I never saw the point, given that we have the Map statistics with clickable graticules. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | :Yeah, that was created by some avid (anonymous? I don't remember) scripter.. I never saw the point, given that we have the Map statistics with clickable graticules. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | *[[Fort Worth, Texas]] is moved to Ft. Worth; all the other "Fort" cities are unabbreviated. | + | *[[Fort Worth, Texas]] is moved to Ft. Worth; all the other "Fort" cities are unabbreviated. Ditto "Saint" cities. |
+ | *Someone hit me over the head and tell me that keeping spam pages around when I have the most points is a BAD idea. | ||
Will add more as I discover them. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 07:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | Will add more as I discover them. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 07:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:59, 21 May 2009
Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion
Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved.
- Category:England is still linked from North geohash achievement. We can replace it with UK, or with the actual grat?
- support -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Category:Central America, Category:Near East - seems like it requires some restructuring of All Graticules?
- delete anyway. The links are not necessary. -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Can I delete Bill Gates achievement (and associated pages) along with Expensive_Geohash (and associated pages)?
- support -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Against Bill Gates. It's humor. Expensive can go though. -- Wmcduff 12:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Category:Meet-up achievement still has a whole bunch of pages in it
- I will check if someone has renamed the achievement.. if yes, have reletbot move them to the renamed category. If not, the delete tag is wrongly placed. -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Tagged as duplicated of Category:Meetup geohash achievement - which is empty. Barring naming problems, I vote we delete the second one, adn keep the first. --joannac
- Category:National Parks got moved to Category:Houston parks - is there some meaning of Houston I'm missing?
- Not that I am aware of. I guess that's just a better classification for the pages that got categorized in the first place -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- None of those parks are in Houston (or Texas). Not sure why the name change
- All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from)
- IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Canandaigua-Corning, New York should probably only have one name.
- And a more pronounceable name in general, yes. :P -- relet 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- HOLY CRAP [[1]]
- Yeah, that was created by some avid (anonymous? I don't remember) scripter.. I never saw the point, given that we have the Map statistics with clickable graticules. -- relet 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Fort Worth, Texas is moved to Ft. Worth; all the other "Fort" cities are unabbreviated. Ditto "Saint" cities.
- Someone hit me over the head and tell me that keeping spam pages around when I have the most points is a BAD idea.
Will add more as I discover them. --joannac 07:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)