Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stacking achievement"
From Geohashing
imported>Koepfel (support) |
imported>Jiml (DNO) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Proposal talk|date=2009-10-17}} | {{Proposal talk|date=2009-10-17}} | ||
| − | '''support'''. I like the idea. Might need to clarify what is the minimum altitude difference between two "levels", and whether you are allowed to bring (ladders/bridges/buildings) to gain the achievement -- [[User:relet|relet]] 17:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC) | + | * '''support'''. I like the idea. Might need to clarify what is the minimum altitude difference between two "levels", and whether you are allowed to bring (ladders/bridges/buildings) to gain the achievement -- [[User:relet|relet]] 17:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC) |
: Clarified the wording as requested. --[[User:Davidc|davidc]] 17:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC) | : Clarified the wording as requested. --[[User:Davidc|davidc]] 17:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | *'''support'''. ilpadre, Fluxkompensator, Mo6eB, his friends and me already did this on today's expedition. Current rules are acceptable, imho. {{User:Koepfel/signature}} 18:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC) | |
| + | *'''Do not oppose'''. Seems like a reasonable achievement definition, but it doesn't seem like it will get achieved very often at all. We can try it and see what happens. [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 02:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:03, 15 November 2009
This is a proposal made on 2009-10-17. Please leave comments and suggestions below, indicating whether you:
- Support the proposal
- Do not oppose it
- Oppose (this option requires you to watch the page and return to comment on modifications), or
- Think it Needs work before you can decide.
See Proposed achievements for more information on this process.
- support. I like the idea. Might need to clarify what is the minimum altitude difference between two "levels", and whether you are allowed to bring (ladders/bridges/buildings) to gain the achievement -- relet 17:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- Clarified the wording as requested. --davidc 17:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- support. ilpadre, Fluxkompensator, Mo6eB, his friends and me already did this on today's expedition. Current rules are acceptable, imho. Koepfel talk 18:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Do not oppose. Seems like a reasonable achievement definition, but it doesn't seem like it will get achieved very often at all. We can try it and see what happens. Jiml 02:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
