Talk:Calgary, Alberta
I added Calgary to the list of Active Graticules on http://wiki.xkcd.com/geohashing/Active_Graticules. When I first added it though, I called it Calgary, AB which created a new and different page than this one. I have since deleted that and changed the listing so that it directs to this page but I think it would better if the page was Calgary, AB as that is how the majority of other cities are listed.
- This has been fixed to current Naming conventions. --Thomcat 17:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Nordegg | Rocky Mountain House | Red Deer | Stettler |
Banff | Calgary NW | Calgary NE | Drumheller |
Fairmont Hot Springs | Calgary SW | Calgary SE | Bassano |
Cranbrook | Sparwood | Fort MacLeod | Lethbridge |
Hi guys, you might be interested in this template I made: Template:GraticuleQ. It lets you specify four-graticule cities like yours in a single wossname. I quickly whipped up this example → , with the four huge maps... normally you'd probably only specify a single map, and make it an image or something (there's an example on the template page). Anyway, it's there if you want to check it out. --Matty 10:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Renaming the suburb graticules
Looking at the Calgary graticules, it doesn't really make that much sense to me that 51,-113; 50,-113; and 50,-114 are labeled as Calgary just because Calgary's suburbs hang a bit into them. If you showed me pictures of those graticules on their own, I'd identify them as Strathmore area, Okotoks/Claresholm area, and Black Diamond area. IMO, doing the following renamings would do a better job of describing the region:
- 51,-114: Calgary NW -> Calgary
- 51,-113: Calgary NE -> Strathmore
- 50,-113: Calgary SE -> Okotoks
- 50,-114: Calgary SW -> Black Diamond
What do people think of this? - Elbie 05:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I lived in Calgary for 10 years, and my family still lives there. (I know that you know Elbie, but for others.) My thoughts:
- 51, -114 Calgary NW: This is definitely the primary Calgary graticule. If any renaming is done, this one should become Calgary.
- 51, -113 Calgary NE: Calgary has grown a lot in this area in recent years. In addition, the part of Calgary in the graticule is much larger than Strathmore as a whole.
- 50, -113 Calgary SE: Industrial Calgary. Population wise, Okotoks may be larger, but land wise, the industrial area is enormous. Some housing developments for Calgary too, but mostly industrial.
- 50, -114 Calgary SW: This one is largely Calgary too. Behind NW, this is the largest. Fish Creek Park (most of it) and Glenmore Reservoir are both in this area, which are central parts of Calgary. Not to mention (most of) Chinook Centre.
In short, I oppose renaming these graticules. If they had to, I may consent to:
- Calgary NW -> Calgary North
- Calgary NE -> Strathmore
- Calgary SE -> Okotoks
- Calgary SW -> Calgary South
However, personally I prefer the NW/NE/SE/SW system. From my (obviously biased) point of view, it describes the area well. Renaming to the suburbs, when the suburbs are so small compared to the chunk of Calgary, doesn't make as much sense. Airdrie would be a good alternate, but unfortunately it is in the same graticule as Calgary NW. -Srs0 09:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)