Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-03-17 49 -122"

Latest revision as of 19:55, 16 September 2009

So I've got to ask; Does a dam count as a land geohash or a water geohash? Is it akin to a bridge? Need we continue this discussion elsewhere? ;) -Woodveil 13:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I would definitely have counted it as a bridge, had the hashpoint fallen on the dam. Water does, after all, pass underneath through the spillway. And I think we'll cross that bridge or dam when we come to it. -24.83.1.77 15:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I really liked the "built in the era when everything looked like a set from Batman" line, by the way. :) I'm a big fan of Industrieromantik. Geohashing almost led me to one of those Batman places once. --Ilpadre 15:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey, you never posted a follow up even though you said you would at the bottom of the report! :-) -- Rhonda 19:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 I would definitely have counted it as a bridge, had the hashpoint fallen on the dam. Water does, after all, pass underneath through the spillway.  And I think we'll cross that bridge or dam when we come to it. -[[Special:Contributions/24.83.1.77|24.83.1.77]] 15:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
+I really liked the "built in the era when everything looked like a set from Batman" line, by the way. :) I'm a big fan of ''Industrieromantik''. Geohashing [http://www.panoramio.com/photo/9324698 almost] led me to one of those Batman places [[2009-02-13 49 8|once]]. --[[User:Ilpadre|Ilpadre]] 15:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
+Hey, you never posted a follow up even though you said you would at the bottom of the report! :-) -- [[User:Rhonda|Rhonda]] 19:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)