Difference between revisions of "User:B0rken"

Revision as of 09:37, 22 May 2008

I think that the Melbourne formula should include the following modifications

1. a Log [1] function to skew results towards the CBD so we see more interesting places and less bush, (as fun as the bush is)
2. ASX 200 [2] data, not the DOW [3]. Oi oi oi.

Revision as of 09:08, 22 May 2008 (view source) imported>B0rken (New page: I think that the Melbourne formula should include the following modifications 1. a Log [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm] function to skew results towards the CBD so we see more int...)		Revision as of 09:37, 22 May 2008 (view source) imported>B0rken Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	1. a Log [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm] function to skew results towards the CBD so we see more interesting places and less bush, (as fun as the bush is)<br>		1. a Log [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm] function to skew results towards the CBD so we see more interesting places and less bush, (as fun as the bush is)<br>
−	2. ASX 200 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26P/ASX_200] data, not the DOW [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Jones_Industrial_Average]. ~~(Who knows how far that sucker will fall once crude hits $2/gal!)~~	+	2. ASX 200 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26P/ASX_200] data, not the DOW [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Jones_Industrial_Average]. Oi oi oi.