Difference between revisions of "User:B0rken"
From Geohashing
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:I agree totally, a smaller graticule closer around the CBD and surrounding suburbs would be much better. Too much bush! [[user:zorg|zorg]] | :I agree totally, a smaller graticule closer around the CBD and surrounding suburbs would be much better. Too much bush! [[user:zorg|zorg]] | ||
| − | + | Well the point was I guess that we can still use both degree box graticule things ... just fudge the data a bit so we don't get muddy boots. Leave that to the 'hardcore' geocachers. | |
| − | Well the point was I guess that we can still use both degree box graticule things... just fudge the data a bit so we don't get muddy boots. Leave that to the 'hardcore' geocachers. | ||
Revision as of 13:38, 22 May 2008
I think that the Melbourne formula should include the following modifications
1. a Log [1] function to skew results towards the CBD so we see more interesting places and less bush, (as fun as the bush can be) [2]
2. ASX 200 [3] data, not the DOW [4]. Oi oi oi.
- I agree totally, a smaller graticule closer around the CBD and surrounding suburbs would be much better. Too much bush! zorg
Well the point was I guess that we can still use both degree box graticule things ... just fudge the data a bit so we don't get muddy boots. Leave that to the 'hardcore' geocachers.
