Difference between revisions of "User:B0rken"

From Geohashing
imported>B0rken
imported>Theduffman
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
[[Image:Bump-polar.jpg|thumb|330 px|]]
 
[[Image:Bump-polar.jpg|thumb|330 px|]]
  
Given Melbourne's radial shape - why not use polar coordinates, with a wedge-shaped exclusion area for Port Philip Bay ... this would include the largest amount of homies with the least amount of bush time. Or am I reinventing the wheel here ... I just figure that if we're going to fuck around with the math to take the Sacred Dow's opening stat into consideration, we might as well do something about our schizophrenic graticules.
+
Given Melbourne's radial shape - why not use polar coordinates, with a wedge-shaped exclusion area for Port Philip Bay ... this would include the largest amount of homies with the least amount of bush time. Or am I reinventing the wheel here ... I just figure that if we're going to f$ck around with the math to take the Sacred Dow's opening stat into consideration, we might as well do something about our schizophrenic graticules.
  
 
I have no idea how to implement this - only that it can be done ...
 
I have no idea how to implement this - only that it can be done ...
 +
The other option would be to use a half-graticule, centered over the CBD.
 +
 +
[[Image:Bump-sat.jpg|thumb|300 px|]]
 +
A revision of the Melbourne Graticule centering it closer to the CBD, and halving its height. Roughly 1/16th of this half- graticule is over water. Coords are -37.5 144.5, -37.5 145.5, -38 144.5, -38 144.5 .
 +
 +
:I'm all for setting ourselves up with a slice a segment of a circle as a graticule in the long-term [[user:theduffman|theduffman]]

Latest revision as of 03:30, 19 June 2008

I think that the Melbourne formula should include the following modifications

1. a Log [1] function to skew results towards the CBD so we see more interesting places and less bush, (as fun as the bush can be) [2]
2. ASX 200 [3] data, not the DOW [4]. Oi oi oi.

I agree totally, a smaller graticule closer around the CBD and surrounding suburbs would be much better. Too much bush! zorg

Well the point was I guess that we can still use both degree box graticule things ... just fudge the data a bit so we don't get muddy boots. Leave that to the 'hardcore' geocachers.

Bump-polar.jpg

Given Melbourne's radial shape - why not use polar coordinates, with a wedge-shaped exclusion area for Port Philip Bay ... this would include the largest amount of homies with the least amount of bush time. Or am I reinventing the wheel here ... I just figure that if we're going to f$ck around with the math to take the Sacred Dow's opening stat into consideration, we might as well do something about our schizophrenic graticules.

I have no idea how to implement this - only that it can be done ... The other option would be to use a half-graticule, centered over the CBD.

Bump-sat.jpg

A revision of the Melbourne Graticule centering it closer to the CBD, and halving its height. Roughly 1/16th of this half- graticule is over water. Coords are -37.5 144.5, -37.5 145.5, -38 144.5, -38 144.5 .

I'm all for setting ourselves up with a slice a segment of a circle as a graticule in the long-term theduffman