Difference between revisions of "Talk:2010-03-08 45 -122"
From Geohashing
imported>Jiml m (Where's the hashpoint, anyway) |
imported>Jiml m (Where's the hashpoint, anyway) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Extra Bonus points if the challenge is completed by the same person who issued it :) --[[User:Meghan|Meghan]] 22:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC) | ::Extra Bonus points if the challenge is completed by the same person who issued it :) --[[User:Meghan|Meghan]] 22:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::It's not like it's mentioned in the [[A_Tale_of_Two_Hashes_achievement#Description_of_Achievement|Achievement Description]], or any thing like that! [[User:Thepiguy|Thepiguy]] 00:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC) | :::It's not like it's mentioned in the [[A_Tale_of_Two_Hashes_achievement#Description_of_Achievement|Achievement Description]], or any thing like that! [[User:Thepiguy|Thepiguy]] 00:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | :Of course, the challenge is to actually get a hashpoint in Vancouver, not water/Mountains/ice [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 00: | + | :Of course, the challenge is to actually get a hashpoint in Vancouver, not water/Mountains/ice [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 00:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:55, 10 March 2010
Woohoo! More geohashing meetups! And what? No Tale of Two Hashes challenge?! Thepiguy 20:45, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- You think we should challange someone to go geohashing in Vancouver?? :-) Jiml 22:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Extra Bonus points if the challenge is completed by the same person who issued it :) --Meghan 22:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- It's not like it's mentioned in the Achievement Description, or any thing like that! Thepiguy 00:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Extra Bonus points if the challenge is completed by the same person who issued it :) --Meghan 22:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, the challenge is to actually get a hashpoint in Vancouver, not water/Mountains/ice Jiml 00:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
