Difference between revisions of "Talk:2010-05-05 45 -122"
From Geohashing
imported>Jiml (Lack of authority) |
imported>Michael5000 m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Well, I'm think that given our [[Guidelines]], you did the right thing. The guidelines say "If someone approaches you and asks you to leave a geohash location on private property, do not force the issue and comply forthwith." I agree that it was public property | + | Well, I'm think that given our [[Guidelines]], you did the right thing. The guidelines say "If someone approaches you and asks you to leave a geohash location on private property, do not force the issue and comply forthwith." I agree that it was public property and she didn't have the right to do so, but we try not to force the issue. [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 17:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC) |
| − | and she didn't have the right to do so, but we try not to force the issue. [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 17:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC) | + | |
| + | *Oh, I forced the issue as far as I could. I have all the respect in the world for that guideline, but I can't agree that it applies to city parks. [[User:Michael5000|Michael5000]] 21:57, 6 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:57, 6 May 2010
Well, I'm think that given our Guidelines, you did the right thing. The guidelines say "If someone approaches you and asks you to leave a geohash location on private property, do not force the issue and comply forthwith." I agree that it was public property and she didn't have the right to do so, but we try not to force the issue. Jiml 17:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I forced the issue as far as I could. I have all the respect in the world for that guideline, but I can't agree that it applies to city parks. Michael5000 21:57, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
