imported>Jiml m (Changing votes?) |
imported>Juventas (more) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I agree: We're not under any time pressure at this time, so we might as well extend it another month. It's as good a method of resolving this tie as any other imho. --[[User:HiroProtagonist|HiroProtagonist]] 10:21, 1 March 2011 (EST) | :I agree: We're not under any time pressure at this time, so we might as well extend it another month. It's as good a method of resolving this tie as any other imho. --[[User:HiroProtagonist|HiroProtagonist]] 10:21, 1 March 2011 (EST) | ||
Are those who voted already allowed to change their vote? If not, with no new votes, the results won't change. [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 23:41, 3 March 2011 (EST) | Are those who voted already allowed to change their vote? If not, with no new votes, the results won't change. [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 23:41, 3 March 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | :[[user:Vswe|Vswe's]] vote is new, and it changed the results. I intend on getting more voters. --[[User:Juventas|Juventas]] 02:38, 4 March 2011 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:38, 4 March 2011
A tie? If there wasn't already have a method of resolving this, I see no reason not to extend voting another month. --Juventas 00:10, 1 March 2011 (EST)
- I agree: We're not under any time pressure at this time, so we might as well extend it another month. It's as good a method of resolving this tie as any other imho. --HiroProtagonist 10:21, 1 March 2011 (EST)
Are those who voted already allowed to change their vote? If not, with no new votes, the results won't change. Jiml 23:41, 3 March 2011 (EST)
