Difference between revisions of "Talk:2012-08-25 47 8"
From Geohashing
imported>OtherJack (Created page with "I was really excited that a language exists with as ridiculously metal a name as "Elder Romansh", until I googled it and it didn't come up. I'm guessing linguist types writing i...") |
imported>Calamus |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Metal Language? == | ||
I was really excited that a language exists with as ridiculously metal a name as "Elder Romansh", until I googled it and it didn't come up. I'm guessing linguist types writing in English say "Old Romansh" or something... a la Old English, Old French, etc. Darn. -- [[User:OtherJack|OtherJack]] 21:44, 27 August 2012 (EDT) | I was really excited that a language exists with as ridiculously metal a name as "Elder Romansh", until I googled it and it didn't come up. I'm guessing linguist types writing in English say "Old Romansh" or something... a la Old English, Old French, etc. Darn. -- [[User:OtherJack|OtherJack]] 21:44, 27 August 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Ehem. I'm afraid there is no English literature on the language, and the English terminology in linguistics is, to express it cautiously, not exactly standardized. Which I think is kind of ironic. | ||
| + | :Anyway, I thought "ancient" sounded too classical, and I didn't really feel like writing "Outdated Romansh", so I went for "older"/"elder", which you see occasionally in linguistic literature. But thinking about it, the language, whose mere existence is subject to debate, is a predecessor to a whole family of languages, so the most correct term would probably be "pre-Romansh". Guess I'll change it to that in order to avoid disappointing metalheads. I mean, it's not even a Germanic language. | ||
| + | :Thanks for the correction. --[[User:Calamus|Calamus]] 03:13, 28 August 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:13, 28 August 2012
Metal Language?
I was really excited that a language exists with as ridiculously metal a name as "Elder Romansh", until I googled it and it didn't come up. I'm guessing linguist types writing in English say "Old Romansh" or something... a la Old English, Old French, etc. Darn. -- OtherJack 21:44, 27 August 2012 (EDT)
- Ehem. I'm afraid there is no English literature on the language, and the English terminology in linguistics is, to express it cautiously, not exactly standardized. Which I think is kind of ironic.
- Anyway, I thought "ancient" sounded too classical, and I didn't really feel like writing "Outdated Romansh", so I went for "older"/"elder", which you see occasionally in linguistic literature. But thinking about it, the language, whose mere existence is subject to debate, is a predecessor to a whole family of languages, so the most correct term would probably be "pre-Romansh". Guess I'll change it to that in order to avoid disappointing metalheads. I mean, it's not even a Germanic language.
- Thanks for the correction. --Calamus 03:13, 28 August 2012 (EDT)
