Difference between revisions of "Talk:2014-10-16 41 -73"

From Geohashing
imported>LeslieHapablap
imported>Palmpje
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
*Shouldn't it be reached? It was in the accuracy of the gps, that's usually all that counts... - [[User:RecentlyChanged|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User_talk:RecentlyChanged|talk]]) 07:20, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
 
*Shouldn't it be reached? It was in the accuracy of the gps, that's usually all that counts... - [[User:RecentlyChanged|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User_talk:RecentlyChanged|talk]]) 07:20, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
 
: Right, didn't read the report carefully enough, sorry. --[[User:LeslieHapablap|LeslieHapablap]] ([[User talk:LeslieHapablap|talk]]) 07:21, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
 
: Right, didn't read the report carefully enough, sorry. --[[User:LeslieHapablap|LeslieHapablap]] ([[User talk:LeslieHapablap|talk]]) 07:21, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
 +
: Hm, I would judge myself as not reached if I was sure the point was on the other side of the wall. In a field with liberty to wander about it's easier. [[User:Palmpje|Palmpje]] ([[User talk:Palmpje|talk]]) 14:01, 21 October 2014 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 18:01, 21 October 2014

Hey there, too bad it didn't work out, maybe next time ;) I took the liberty of adding the correct "Not reached" category to the report. Cheers! --LeslieHapablap (talk) 07:16, 17 October 2014 (EDT)

  • Shouldn't it be reached? It was in the accuracy of the gps, that's usually all that counts... - RecentlyChanged (talk) 07:20, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
Right, didn't read the report carefully enough, sorry. --LeslieHapablap (talk) 07:21, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
Hm, I would judge myself as not reached if I was sure the point was on the other side of the wall. In a field with liberty to wander about it's easier. Palmpje (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2014 (EDT)