Difference between revisions of "Talk:2015-04-19 global"
imported>Micsnare |
imported>B2c m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Wow, Congrats Nathan, you did it again! Lucky you, that the Global Hash fell in your area (and not as usual into the sea). A Global Hash is still on my to-do list. -- [[User:Micsnare|Micsnare]] ([[User talk:Micsnare|talk]]) 09:11, 20 April 2015 (CEST) | Wow, Congrats Nathan, you did it again! Lucky you, that the Global Hash fell in your area (and not as usual into the sea). A Global Hash is still on my to-do list. -- [[User:Micsnare|Micsnare]] ([[User talk:Micsnare|talk]]) 09:11, 20 April 2015 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Congrats dude, nicely done, I'm really curious about the report! The odds of grabbing two globalhashes are really low... why does it never fall someplace in central europe *whine* ;) * [[User:B2c]] (User talk:B2c|talk]]) 11:40, 20 April 2015 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 09:40, 20 April 2015
Cool!!! Congrats! Mystrsyko seemed to think it was on Armstrong Coal Company property, which is part of why he declined to attempt it... see our discussion at User talk:Mystrsyko. Did you encounter any problems related to this or was access easy? -- OtherJack (talk) 00:12, 20 April 2015 (EDT)
Wow, Congrats Nathan, you did it again! Lucky you, that the Global Hash fell in your area (and not as usual into the sea). A Global Hash is still on my to-do list. -- Micsnare (talk) 09:11, 20 April 2015 (CEST)
Congrats dude, nicely done, I'm really curious about the report! The odds of grabbing two globalhashes are really low... why does it never fall someplace in central europe *whine* ;) * User:B2c (User talk:B2c|talk]]) 11:40, 20 April 2015 (CEST)
