Difference between revisions of "Talk:2017-12-01 -35 149"
From Geohashing
imported>Yosef (Created page with "I'm sorry that we still disagree. You did not successfully stand at the hashpoint. You stood seven meters away from the hashpoint. It was not due to you making an educated...") |
imported>Thomcat |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm sorry that we still disagree. You did not successfully stand at the hashpoint. You stood seven meters away from the hashpoint. It was not due to you making an educated guess because Google is quite clear in Canberra where the hashpoint is. You just couldn't trespass in order to actually stand at the point. That's fine. Please call it a "No Trespassing" hash rather than a successful hash in order to maintain the integrity of the game. | I'm sorry that we still disagree. You did not successfully stand at the hashpoint. You stood seven meters away from the hashpoint. It was not due to you making an educated guess because Google is quite clear in Canberra where the hashpoint is. You just couldn't trespass in order to actually stand at the point. That's fine. Please call it a "No Trespassing" hash rather than a successful hash in order to maintain the integrity of the game. | ||
| + | :In fact, the process of going to the door to knock and ask if you could stand on the hashpoint would have actually carried you over the hashpoint, yes? Why not try for ambassador in that case? --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 05:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:12, 6 December 2017
I'm sorry that we still disagree. You did not successfully stand at the hashpoint. You stood seven meters away from the hashpoint. It was not due to you making an educated guess because Google is quite clear in Canberra where the hashpoint is. You just couldn't trespass in order to actually stand at the point. That's fine. Please call it a "No Trespassing" hash rather than a successful hash in order to maintain the integrity of the game.
