Difference between revisions of "2019-01-18 54 -2"

Revision as of 17:31, 26 July 2019

There's a path going through that location on the Ordnance Survey maps, but not a right of way. No idea if there's permissive public access without going to check.

Off I go! -- Angel (talk) @54.0674,-2.7842 13:09, 18 January 2019 (GMT+00:00)

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 <!-- Add any achievement ribbons you earned below, or remove this section -->
-<!-- =============== USEFUL CATEGORIES FOLLOW ================
-Delete the next line ONLY if you have chosen the appropriate categories below. If you are unsure, don't worry. People will read your report and help you with the classification. -->
-[[Category:New report]]
-<!-- ==REQUEST FOR TWITTER BOT== Please leave either the New report or the Expedition planning category in as long as you work on it. This helps the twitter bot a lot with announcing the right outcome at the right moment. -->
-<!-- Potential categories. Please include all the ones appropriate to your expedition -->
-<!-- If this is a planning page:
 [[Category:Expedition planning]]
--->
 <!-- If all those plans are never acted upon, change [[Category:Expedition planning]] to [[Category:Not reached - Did not attempt]]. -->


Fri 18 Jan 2019 in 54,-2: 54.0570718, -2.7443588 geohashing.info google osm bing/os kml crox