Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mapillary achievement"
From Geohashing
(feedback) |
(Adding thoughts to proposed achievements) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'd rather this just be a facet of the [[OpenStreetMap achievement]]; perhaps the ribbon template could be edited to specify in what way the awardee contributed. Since there's also KartaView for OSM-adjacent street-level imagery, and too one can upload [[tracklog#openstreetmap.org]]s. Although maybe those should just be sidenotes to a given edit/set of edits? [[User:Arlo|Arlo]] ([[User talk:Arlo|talk]]) 12:38, 23 January 2021 (UTC) | I'd rather this just be a facet of the [[OpenStreetMap achievement]]; perhaps the ribbon template could be edited to specify in what way the awardee contributed. Since there's also KartaView for OSM-adjacent street-level imagery, and too one can upload [[tracklog#openstreetmap.org]]s. Although maybe those should just be sidenotes to a given edit/set of edits? [[User:Arlo|Arlo]] ([[User talk:Arlo|talk]]) 12:38, 23 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Oppose''' to the achievement in this format as it becomes a case of 'Why not have one for this software as well?'. I agree with the above that a combined achievement for contributions would be better, the specifics of which would need to be discussed in more depth. | ||
Revision as of 02:28, 27 February 2024
I'd rather this just be a facet of the OpenStreetMap achievement; perhaps the ribbon template could be edited to specify in what way the awardee contributed. Since there's also KartaView for OSM-adjacent street-level imagery, and too one can upload tracklog#openstreetmap.orgs. Although maybe those should just be sidenotes to a given edit/set of edits? Arlo (talk) 12:38, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Oppose to the achievement in this format as it becomes a case of 'Why not have one for this software as well?'. I agree with the above that a combined achievement for contributions would be better, the specifics of which would need to be discussed in more depth.
