Difference between revisions of "Talk:Milwaukee, Wisconsin"
imported>Moose Hole (Israel's algorithm is very interesting.) |
imported>Thomcat |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I say this because with all that water its a good bet that you'd get an awful lot of watery locations before you got just one dry one. I can't say I'd have the tenacity to keep checking back daily. | I say this because with all that water its a good bet that you'd get an awful lot of watery locations before you got just one dry one. I can't say I'd have the tenacity to keep checking back daily. | ||
| − | -- [[Special:Contributions/69.210.97.167|69.210.97.167]] (b+xkcd@REMOVETHISPARTvivashevegas.com) | + | -- [[Special:Contributions/69.210.97.167|69.210.97.167]] (b+xkcd@REMOVETHISPARTvivashevegas.com) 16:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC) |
:You may find [[:Category:Alternate algorithm]] useful. You could also use a neighboring graticule if it suits you better. -- [[User:Moose Hole|Moose Hole]] 17:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | :You may find [[:Category:Alternate algorithm]] useful. You could also use a neighboring graticule if it suits you better. -- [[User:Moose Hole|Moose Hole]] 17:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == November 19-21 == | ||
| + | Hello Brew-city geohashers! [[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] will be in your graticule in just a few short days. Hoping for a geohash within public transit, and always happy to meet more geohashers! --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 17:14, 16 November 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | :Okay, geohash point is close to town, but in the lake. boat rental anyone? --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 10:13, 19 November 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Great hashpoint, just a week too late for me. Congrats [[User:Dunsell|Dunsell]] on the lucky spot, and sorry I missed you! --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 16:23, 27 November 2013 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:23, 27 November 2013
I wonder if it would be possible to create a "polygon" (for lack of a better term) that represented just the dry land portion of this region, and then construct some program or script to compare each day's coordinates to the polygon to test whether or not that day's location is on land. Perhaps an feed could be built with new entries whenever a dry-land location occurs.
I say this because with all that water its a good bet that you'd get an awful lot of watery locations before you got just one dry one. I can't say I'd have the tenacity to keep checking back daily.
-- 69.210.97.167 (b+xkcd@REMOVETHISPARTvivashevegas.com) 16:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- You may find Category:Alternate algorithm useful. You could also use a neighboring graticule if it suits you better. -- Moose Hole 17:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
November 19-21
Hello Brew-city geohashers! Thomcat will be in your graticule in just a few short days. Hoping for a geohash within public transit, and always happy to meet more geohashers! --Thomcat (talk) 17:14, 16 November 2013 (EST)
