Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Graticules by feature"
imported>Danatar (New page: I started naming all-water graticules on the "All Graticules" page the way "name of water body lat, lon" (e.g. Mediterranean Sea 39, 7). When a page for such a graticule is created (where...) |
imported>ReletBot m (Category talk:Graticules by Feature moved to Category talk:Graticules by feature: Robot: Category was moved to Graticules by feature) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 18:04, 4 April 2009
I started naming all-water graticules on the "All Graticules" page the way "name of water body lat, lon" (e.g. Mediterranean Sea 39, 7). When a page for such a graticule is created (where are all the water and air geohashers?), it should be put into the appropriate category. This will lead to an increase in categories in "Category:Graticules by Feature", so perhaps there should be "Category:All-water Graticules" to place them in, what do you think? Large ocean/sea names should be preferred over small bay one's, but for me e.g. the Mediterranean Sea and North Sea graticules just shouldn't be named "Atlantic Ocean lat, lon" although they are technically part of it (see marginal sea and mediterranean sea). But I put the Tyrrhenian Sea into Mediterranean Sea because it is so small.
Category:Graticules by Feature
- Category:All-water Graticules
- Category:Atlantic Ocean
- Atlantic Ocean 64, 6
- Category:Baltic Sea
- Category:Caribbean Sea
- Category:Mediterranean Sea
- Mediterranean Sea 39, 7
- Category:North Sea
- Category:Pacific Ocean
- Category:Atlantic Ocean
OR, if marginal seas are considered a subcategory:
Category:Graticules by Feature
- Category:All-water Graticules
- Category:Atlantic Ocean
- Atlantic Ocean 64, 6
- Category:Caribbean Sea
- Category:North Sea
- Category:Baltic Sea
- Category:Mediterranean Sea
- Mediterranean Sea 39, 7
- Category:Pacific Ocean
- Category:Atlantic Ocean
and so on. Danatar 10:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
