Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-04-29 50 11"

From Geohashing
imported>Jiml
(Possible Retro-hash?)
 
imported>Jiml
m (Jim was confused.)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Maybe I'm reading the report wrong, but I think maybe this was
+
Jim was confused by the implications of the W30 rule and thought this was a retro hashHe
a Retro Hash, not a day-ofAm I missing something, or are
+
has been disabused of that notion.  [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 03:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
the categories wrong? [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 01:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 03:08, 26 June 2009

Jim was confused by the implications of the W30 rule and thought this was a retro hash. He has been disabused of that notion. Jiml 03:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)