Difference between revisions of "Talk:2012-03-08 47 -40"
From Geohashing
imported>Phyzome (checked in Zurich?) |
imported>Jevanyn |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Oh no! I'm guessing you checked the coordinates in Zürich and translated them over to the graticule in question? By the way, great cockpit photo. -- [[User:Phyzome|Phyzome]] 14:16, 11 March 2012 (EDT) | Oh no! I'm guessing you checked the coordinates in Zürich and translated them over to the graticule in question? By the way, great cockpit photo. -- [[User:Phyzome|Phyzome]] 14:16, 11 March 2012 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Incredible! I never thought, a commercial passenger flight would (slighlty) change its route to reach a hashpoint. Good luck next time from me, too! --[[User:Reinhard|Reinhard]] 04:10, 12 March 2012 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ok, "nm" is "nautical miles", not nanometers. That was very weird for a moment. Good luck next time, thanks for the effort and the story! -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 11:44, 27 March 2012 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 15:44, 27 March 2012
Too bad you didn't make it. A very interesting "expedition" anyway. Better luck next time :-) --Fasanen 14:04, 11 March 2012 (EDT)
Oh no! I'm guessing you checked the coordinates in Zürich and translated them over to the graticule in question? By the way, great cockpit photo. -- Phyzome 14:16, 11 March 2012 (EDT)
Incredible! I never thought, a commercial passenger flight would (slighlty) change its route to reach a hashpoint. Good luck next time from me, too! --Reinhard 04:10, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
Ok, "nm" is "nautical miles", not nanometers. That was very weird for a moment. Good luck next time, thanks for the effort and the story! -- Jevanyn 11:44, 27 March 2012 (EDT)