Difference between revisions of "Talk:2015-07-25 43 -84"
From Geohashing
imported>1PE (Created page with "I agree with your approach, and reticence at not trespassing. I follow the same approach here in Australia, especially as there are strong WHS requirements placed on landowner...") |
imported>Mcbaneg |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I agree with your approach, and reticence at not trespassing. I follow the same approach here in Australia, especially as there are strong WHS requirements placed on landowners even when someone is just wandering around.[[User:1PE|1PE (Canberra)]] ([[User talk:1PE|talk]]) 19:51, 27 July 2015 (EDT) | I agree with your approach, and reticence at not trespassing. I follow the same approach here in Australia, especially as there are strong WHS requirements placed on landowners even when someone is just wandering around.[[User:1PE|1PE (Canberra)]] ([[User talk:1PE|talk]]) 19:51, 27 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for reading. When the land is privately owned but accessible and not posted, I'll often enter unless it seems clearly out of line. But when there are signs, the No Trespassing rules are pretty clear! [[User:Mcbaneg|Mcbaneg]] ([[User talk:Mcbaneg|talk]]) 21:24, 27 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:24, 28 July 2015
I agree with your approach, and reticence at not trespassing. I follow the same approach here in Australia, especially as there are strong WHS requirements placed on landowners even when someone is just wandering around.1PE (Canberra) (talk) 19:51, 27 July 2015 (EDT)
Thanks for reading. When the land is privately owned but accessible and not posted, I'll often enter unless it seems clearly out of line. But when there are signs, the No Trespassing rules are pretty clear! Mcbaneg (talk) 21:24, 27 July 2015 (EDT)
