Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rite of passage achievement"
From Geohashing
m (my 0.02) |
(Adding thoughts to proposed achievements) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* '''Do not oppose''' --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 11:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC) | * '''Do not oppose''' --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 11:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
* '''Needs work''' to distinguish between the youngest hasher, anniversary retro, and coffin potato hashes we have already -- and if loosely defined so that diverse cultures can partake, why not just encourage people to make their own gratuitous ribbon? [[User:Arlo|Arlo]] ([[User talk:Arlo|talk]]) 02:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC) | * '''Needs work''' to distinguish between the youngest hasher, anniversary retro, and coffin potato hashes we have already -- and if loosely defined so that diverse cultures can partake, why not just encourage people to make their own gratuitous ribbon? [[User:Arlo|Arlo]] ([[User talk:Arlo|talk]]) 02:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | * I have to agree with [[User:Arlo|Arlo]] - this really should be done in form of gratuitous ribbons instead, making which should also be more encouraged. As a result, I '''oppose''' this achievement while supporting wider use of gratuitous ribbons. [[User:V1993|V1993]] ([[User talk:V1993|talk]]) 11:17, 23 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | * '''Oppose''' with the suggestion that gratuitous ribbons would be better suited, as mentioned above. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 03:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:04, 27 February 2024
- Do not oppose --Fippe (talk) 11:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Needs work to distinguish between the youngest hasher, anniversary retro, and coffin potato hashes we have already -- and if loosely defined so that diverse cultures can partake, why not just encourage people to make their own gratuitous ribbon? Arlo (talk) 02:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Arlo - this really should be done in form of gratuitous ribbons instead, making which should also be more encouraged. As a result, I oppose this achievement while supporting wider use of gratuitous ribbons. V1993 (talk) 11:17, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose with the suggestion that gratuitous ribbons would be better suited, as mentioned above. --KerrMcF (talk) 03:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
