Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chicago, Illinois"
From Geohashing
(New page: Why not just run the algorithm for the four useful boxes and choose the point closest to the city center? It seems like it would have roughly the same effect, but wouldn't require special-...) |
(→2008-05-31 Meet: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why not just run the algorithm for the four useful boxes and choose the point closest to the city center? It seems like it would have roughly the same effect, but wouldn't require special-casing the algorithm. [[Special:Contributions/67.176.137.171|67.176.137.171]] 00:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | Why not just run the algorithm for the four useful boxes and choose the point closest to the city center? It seems like it would have roughly the same effect, but wouldn't require special-casing the algorithm. [[Special:Contributions/67.176.137.171|67.176.137.171]] 00:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 2008-05-31 Meet == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've got a small group (carfull) of people who are planning to do the meet this week. Which graticule should we be using? Has there been a ruling on the shifted graticule/multi-graticule thing? | ||
Revision as of 20:10, 29 May 2008
Why not just run the algorithm for the four useful boxes and choose the point closest to the city center? It seems like it would have roughly the same effect, but wouldn't require special-casing the algorithm. 67.176.137.171 00:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
2008-05-31 Meet
I've got a small group (carfull) of people who are planning to do the meet this week. Which graticule should we be using? Has there been a ruling on the shifted graticule/multi-graticule thing?
