imported>Relet |
imported>Jiml |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Maybe I'm reading the report wrong, but I think maybe this was
| + | Jim was confused by the implications of the W30 rule and thought this was a retro hash. He |
| − | a Retro Hash, not a day-of. Am I missing something, or are
| + | has been disabused of that notion. [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 03:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC) |
| − | the categories wrong? [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 01:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I read or see nothing that would indicate a retro expedition. Even the Exif data shows the right date. --[[User:Ilpadre|ilpadre]] 05:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::Okay - I was thrown off by "the next day, I devoted my lunch hour to finding the co-ordinates". Probably an W30/timezone issue confusing me. [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 08:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :::Yes, we got the coordinates the day before and Paintedhell thought about going there at midnight, but she didn't and went there after sleeping, but still on the exact date. No retro hash. It's a pitty, I couldn't go there due to lack of time. It still is the closest hash up to now. Right between my home and my work place.--[[User:Reinhard|Reinhard]] 09:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
Latest revision as of 03:08, 26 June 2009
Jim was confused by the implications of the W30 rule and thought this was a retro hash. He
has been disabused of that notion. Jiml 03:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
