Difference between revisions of "Talk:All Graticules"
imported>Jevanyn (→Active graticules missing from graticule.kml: new section) |
imported>Jevanyn (→Active graticules missing from graticule.kml) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
== Active graticules missing from graticule.kml == | == Active graticules missing from graticule.kml == | ||
| − | Whenever I load the active graticule map, there are several grats that do not come up, for example, [[New York, New York|New York]] and [[Sacramento, California|Sacramento]]. Both of these grats are plenty active, but they don't get squares, while hundreds of inactive grats are present. Can we modify this file to include only active grats, or have an alternate file that only has active grats? And how do we keep it up to date? | + | Whenever I load the active graticule map, there are several grats that do not come up, for example, [[New York, New York|New York]] and [[Sacramento, California|Sacramento]]. Both of these grats are plenty active, but they don't get squares, while hundreds of inactive grats are present. Can we modify this file to include only active grats, or have an alternate file that only has active grats? And how do we keep it up to date? ''Update'' I see, it's meant to be read in Google Earth. But it covers the graticule with a black square, and adds a white outline for inactive grats. How about just an outline, for just active grats? -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 19:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:39, 15 July 2008
The All Graticules page is used by the reference implentation (and others) to look up a place name from coordinate data alone. This also allows a human user to find (or verify the non-existance of) a graticule in the same way.
This talk page has been used to discuss naming conventions and the like. The mostly agreed upon points are summarized below.
 | Topics on this page which have clearly been handled or resolved can be found in the archives. When archiving a section of this Talk page, please say so in the edit summary here. |
Contents
Graticule naming
Graticules are named based on the largest or most well known place located within them. A proper name consists of this name, then a comma, then the state or province or country name.
Long names, while inclusive, are generally frowned upon. Multiple common names within a graticule can best be handled with a redirect page.
Some cities are split two (or four!) ways by graticule lines. They will have two or more listings on this page, and the actual city page will usually list multiple graticules. Interested parties should check those individual pages for how meetups are determined. The Category Split Cities lists many of these locations.
Ordering
The current ordering of graticules within the continents is listed below the continent name. The automated tools don't have a preference for graticule ordering, of course, so this is primarily a human convenience.
Categories
On each graticule page are multiple categories.
- Active or Inactive
- Local geographical designation (State, Province, or Country)
- Regional features shared with other graticules (Rivers, Park Systems, etc.)
The Local geographical designations will be clustered into larger designations, then on up to continents. This allows, for example, the United States to be searched for the state of Idaho, then the city of Coeur d'Alene.
Other issues
It is not necessary to list contact information for a particular graticule - the history of wiki edits will effectively do that.
Active graticules missing from graticule.kml
Whenever I load the active graticule map, there are several grats that do not come up, for example, New York and Sacramento. Both of these grats are plenty active, but they don't get squares, while hundreds of inactive grats are present. Can we modify this file to include only active grats, or have an alternate file that only has active grats? And how do we keep it up to date? Update I see, it's meant to be read in Google Earth. But it covers the graticule with a black square, and adds a white outline for inactive grats. How about just an outline, for just active grats? -- Jevanyn 19:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
