Difference between revisions of "Talk:Milano, Italy"
From Geohashing
imported>Francescomapelli |
imported>Jiml m (Nerd sniping?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ok, nerd discussion starting, just joking. | Ok, nerd discussion starting, just joking. | ||
but... | but... | ||
| − | "Attempted & Achieved Geohashes" should be reworded to Attempted or Achieved Geohashes, since the and condition is not met for item "September 1, 2010: nice valley near Bergamo." | + | "Attempted & Achieved Geohashes" should be reworded to Attempted or Achieved Geohashes, since the 'and' condition is not met for item "September 1, 2010: nice valley near Bergamo." [[User:Francescomapelli|Francescomapelli]] 17:46, 1 September 2010 (UTC) |
| − | + | ||
| + | Go for it. It's your graticule page. But despite the technical inaccuracy, I'd say the English flows better with 'and' [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 18:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:22, 1 September 2010
Ok, nerd discussion starting, just joking. but... "Attempted & Achieved Geohashes" should be reworded to Attempted or Achieved Geohashes, since the 'and' condition is not met for item "September 1, 2010: nice valley near Bergamo." Francescomapelli 17:46, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Go for it. It's your graticule page. But despite the technical inaccuracy, I'd say the English flows better with 'and' Jiml 18:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
