Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Important geohashers"
From Geohashing
imported>Jevanyn (Created page with "'''Proposed''': This category should be used for geohashers who are willing to be advocates for the sport, answer questions from newbies, or for recognizing geohashers who've ...") |
imported>OtherJack |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Proposed''': This category should be used for geohashers who are willing to be advocates for the sport, answer questions from newbies, or for recognizing geohashers who've done something useful. The inside joke that geohashing does not make someone important has gone cold (it had a good innings), but this can be an opportunity for growth and recognition. -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] ([[User talk:Jevanyn|talk]]) 10:50, 8 January 2014 (EST) | '''Proposed''': This category should be used for geohashers who are willing to be advocates for the sport, answer questions from newbies, or for recognizing geohashers who've done something useful. The inside joke that geohashing does not make someone important has gone cold (it had a good innings), but this can be an opportunity for growth and recognition. -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] ([[User talk:Jevanyn|talk]]) 10:50, 8 January 2014 (EST) | ||
| + | :I think we can have a category for folks who are willing to answer newbie questions without having to actually call them "important" or requiring them to be advocates or be useful... I like how egalitarian geohashing is! -- [[User:OtherJack|OtherJack]] ([[User talk:OtherJack|talk]]) 06:04, 9 January 2014 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 11:04, 9 January 2014
Proposed: This category should be used for geohashers who are willing to be advocates for the sport, answer questions from newbies, or for recognizing geohashers who've done something useful. The inside joke that geohashing does not make someone important has gone cold (it had a good innings), but this can be an opportunity for growth and recognition. -- Jevanyn (talk) 10:50, 8 January 2014 (EST)
