Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Important geohashers"
From Geohashing
imported>Jevanyn |
imported>Calamus |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I think we can have a category for folks who are willing to answer newbie questions without having to actually call them "important" or requiring them to be advocates or be useful... I like how egalitarian geohashing is! -- [[User:OtherJack|OtherJack]] ([[User talk:OtherJack|talk]]) 06:04, 9 January 2014 (EST) | :I think we can have a category for folks who are willing to answer newbie questions without having to actually call them "important" or requiring them to be advocates or be useful... I like how egalitarian geohashing is! -- [[User:OtherJack|OtherJack]] ([[User talk:OtherJack|talk]]) 06:04, 9 January 2014 (EST) | ||
::Fair enough -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] ([[User talk:Jevanyn|talk]]) 10:10, 9 January 2014 (EST) | ::Fair enough -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] ([[User talk:Jevanyn|talk]]) 10:10, 9 January 2014 (EST) | ||
| + | ::I agree. What we need is more like a "Category: Geohashers who won't shout at you for asking questions" than a question of importance. Er... could somebody come up with a better name? "Category: Mentors" already sounds self-important and implies some kind of superiority, so anti-hierarchical Calamus doesn't like it. --[[User:Calamus|Calamus]] 16:49, 12 January 2014 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:49, 12 January 2014
Proposed: This category should be used for geohashers who are willing to be advocates for the sport, answer questions from newbies, or for recognizing geohashers who've done something useful. The inside joke that geohashing does not make someone important has gone cold (it had a good innings), but this can be an opportunity for growth and recognition. -- Jevanyn (talk) 10:50, 8 January 2014 (EST)
- I think we can have a category for folks who are willing to answer newbie questions without having to actually call them "important" or requiring them to be advocates or be useful... I like how egalitarian geohashing is! -- OtherJack (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2014 (EST)
- Fair enough -- Jevanyn (talk) 10:10, 9 January 2014 (EST)
- I agree. What we need is more like a "Category: Geohashers who won't shout at you for asking questions" than a question of importance. Er... could somebody come up with a better name? "Category: Mentors" already sounds self-important and implies some kind of superiority, so anti-hierarchical Calamus doesn't like it. --Calamus 16:49, 12 January 2014 (EST)
