Difference between revisions of "Talk:Twin Cities, Minnesota"
From Geohashing
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Hey guys, I just made [[Template:GraticuleQ]], if you're interested. I had your cities specifically in mind when doing it (see the [[Template:GraticuleQ|examples]]!) --[[User:Mattyk|Matty K]] 13:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC) | Hey guys, I just made [[Template:GraticuleQ]], if you're interested. I had your cities specifically in mind when doing it (see the [[Template:GraticuleQ|examples]]!) --[[User:Mattyk|Matty K]] 13:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| − | Are we supposed to figure out from the code what this does, or is there an explanation somewhere? -- Ford | + | Are we supposed to figure out from the code what this does, or is there an explanation somewhere? As I see it, the main problem is that graticules are too big for those of us who prefer to travel by bicycle or bus. The lack of activity in recent months seems consistent with this hypothesis. -- Ford |
Revision as of 16:03, 29 October 2008
So, how do we feel about making a section for a rundown of hash attempts being made on hashes that are known in advanced? (ie: weekends.) Rather than wait for an answer, I'm going to post a new section for this. Redsai 15:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey guys, I just made Template:GraticuleQ, if you're interested. I had your cities specifically in mind when doing it (see the examples!) --Matty K 13:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Are we supposed to figure out from the code what this does, or is there an explanation somewhere? As I see it, the main problem is that graticules are too big for those of us who prefer to travel by bicycle or bus. The lack of activity in recent months seems consistent with this hypothesis. -- Ford
