Difference between revisions of "User talk:Thomcat"

From Geohashing
imported>AshleyMorton
imported>Jevanyn
(Cape May graticule: new section)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
I know only about as much as you do, but I've tried something out, and left a message on the category page where you asked your question. [[User:AshleyMorton|AshleyMorton]] 14:42, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 
I know only about as much as you do, but I've tried something out, and left a message on the category page where you asked your question. [[User:AshleyMorton|AshleyMorton]] 14:42, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Cape May graticule ==
 +
 +
I think it's closer to 99.5% water.  :-) Since Jan 1st, the geohash has been on land 3 times, and twice it was wetland. On the other hand, a lot of people in the area own boats, so close-to-shore spots are fair game for weekend meet-ups. --[[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 15:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:34, 12 June 2008

There was one in Tyler? Too bad I don't go to school near there anymore! --BenPop 00:35, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Goals

Having edited one quarter of our Three Graticule Tall state, I firmly intend to visit a geohash in each Graticule of our state - eventually. Going to be tough to catch those two coastal ones (Forks and the one south of it). Although the "Victoria" one contains a nub of Washington, I am going to call that one Canada and skip it for now.

Categories

I know only about as much as you do, but I've tried something out, and left a message on the category page where you asked your question. AshleyMorton 14:42, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Cape May graticule

I think it's closer to 99.5% water.  :-) Since Jan 1st, the geohash has been on land 3 times, and twice it was wetland. On the other hand, a lot of people in the area own boats, so close-to-shore spots are fair game for weekend meet-ups. --Jevanyn 15:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)