Difference between revisions of "User:ZorMonkey"

From Geohashing
imported>Wmcduff
m (Undo revision 45140 by 195.225.178.39 (Talk))
(rGsRScdUznDoliuUbT)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:Spammed}}
+
comment6, http://czyoiifq.freehostingz.com/map_7.html javon walker bloody shirt photo, ibkpdz, http://fvrnrhyk.aokhost.com/map_10.html jayesh vira,  erunp, http://czyoiifq.hostedwith.us/map_9.html jayda garnett,  :(((, http://fvrnrhyk.101freehost.com/map_0.html jeff gunia, 2065, http://fvrnrhyk.101freehost.com/map_5.html jefferson county alabama tax assessor,  >:)), http://czyoiifq.freehostingz.com/map_0.html jay falini shore,  >:OOO, http://czyoiifq.site2gb.com/map_8.html jay palenko,  yvy, http://fvrnrhyk.00bp.com/map.html map,  xedlfa, http://fvrnrhyk.aokhost.com/map.html map,  8267,
 
 
I'm wondering what would happen if there were more text on this page to begin with. Seeing as spammers can post their garbage here with impunity, I will put a bunch of equally useless things, to test what happens.
 
 
 
==Theory #1==
 
The spammers delete everything on the page and replace it with their own. That is what seems to be happening now. It is really quite sad, because it means poor ZorMonkey can never have a proper User page and we won't know about him.
 
 
 
So far all attacks following my sectionizing the page have erased everything before leaving their garbage.
 
 
 
==Theory #2==
 
The spammers randomly select a section to replace with their own stuff. This is supported by the fact that the Main Page Talk gets spammed but not everything is deleted. This theory explains why I am making these sections.
 
 
 
==Theory #3==
 
I don't have a theory number three, but I wanted a third section.
 
 
 
==Note==
 
If this were my page, I would incensed. Absolutely furious. I would want to track the spammers down and remove their various organs through their various orifices. I'm glad for ZorMonkey's blood pressure and legal status that s/he seems to have a more laid back attitude towards this curious targeting.
 
 
 
==More notes==
 
We should enable some [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Anti-spam Anti-spam features]. I've made good experiences with the regex blacklist, and modifying the anti-spam error message; i.e. Blocking any edit containing "*viagra*" (or some of the html that spammers typically use), and not obviously telling that the edits did not succeed. I've never seen my spammers again.
 

Revision as of 14:18, 24 August 2008