Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ambassador achievement"
From Geohashing
imported>UnwiseOwl (Award Suggestion) |
imported>Ekorren (Unneccessary, IMHO) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
IS there scope for a failed Ambassadorship here, to encourage trying to gain entry to those more difficult areas? | IS there scope for a failed Ambassadorship here, to encourage trying to gain entry to those more difficult areas? | ||
I'm thinking it might be fun to call it the Ulrich Von Hassel award, or something along these lines. Any thoughts? -- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 03:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | I'm thinking it might be fun to call it the Ulrich Von Hassel award, or something along these lines. Any thoughts? -- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 03:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :It's clearly No Trespassing if you fail, and you can always describe it in further detail yourself. I don't think we need a special award. (Who was von Hassel, anyway?) --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 08:05, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:05, 27 November 2008
IS there scope for a failed Ambassadorship here, to encourage trying to gain entry to those more difficult areas? I'm thinking it might be fun to call it the Ulrich Von Hassel award, or something along these lines. Any thoughts? -- UnwiseOwl 03:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's clearly No Trespassing if you fail, and you can always describe it in further detail yourself. I don't think we need a special award. (Who was von Hassel, anyway?) --Ekorren 08:05, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
