Difference between revisions of "User:B0rken"
From Geohashing
imported>B0rken |
imported>Zorg |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
1. a Log [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm] function to skew results towards the CBD so we see more interesting places and less bush, (as fun as the bush is)<br> | 1. a Log [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm] function to skew results towards the CBD so we see more interesting places and less bush, (as fun as the bush is)<br> | ||
2. ASX 200 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26P/ASX_200] data, not the DOW [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Jones_Industrial_Average]. Oi oi oi. | 2. ASX 200 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26P/ASX_200] data, not the DOW [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Jones_Industrial_Average]. Oi oi oi. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I agree totally, a smaller graticule closer around the CBD and surrounding suburbs would be much better. Too much bush! [[user:zorg|zorg]] | ||
Revision as of 09:40, 22 May 2008
I think that the Melbourne formula should include the following modifications
1. a Log [1] function to skew results towards the CBD so we see more interesting places and less bush, (as fun as the bush is)
2. ASX 200 [2] data, not the DOW [3]. Oi oi oi.
- I agree totally, a smaller graticule closer around the CBD and surrounding suburbs would be much better. Too much bush! zorg
