Difference between revisions of "Talk:San Jose, California"
imported>Ted (removed question for which the answer was: operator malfunction) |
imported>Adambb |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Considering this graticule covers more than half of the South Bay, including San Jose (largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area, 3rd largest in the state, 10th largest in the country), I think a better name would be the San Jose graticule. -- ''[[User:Ebrowne|<font color="Blue">Ebrowne</font>]] ([[User talk:Ebrowne|<font color="Blue" size="1">talk</font>]]) 20:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | Considering this graticule covers more than half of the South Bay, including San Jose (largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area, 3rd largest in the state, 10th largest in the country), I think a better name would be the San Jose graticule. -- ''[[User:Ebrowne|<font color="Blue">Ebrowne</font>]] ([[User talk:Ebrowne|<font color="Blue" size="1">talk</font>]]) 20:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not sure what's meant by this last anonymous edit: "Authorities have been alerted, and will arrest anyone caught on the property." considering the date 05-26 is in the past and I'm not aware that anyone tried to reach those coordinates on Monday. Maybe someone has misinterpreted the rules of this whole thing and thinks we're going to revisit past coordinates... well we could of course, but it's not likely. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm removing this, I think the general guideline of "no trespassing on private property" will do just fine, without retroactively threatening to arrest people. | ||
Revision as of 05:17, 29 May 2008
I don't think East Bay is a good name for this graticule. Most of what I consider to be the East Bay (Oakland, Hayward, Union City, half of Fremont) are in the San Francisco graticule. This graticule does cover the Contra Costa Valley, but that's not as East Bay as Oakland.
Considering this graticule covers more than half of the South Bay, including San Jose (largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area, 3rd largest in the state, 10th largest in the country), I think a better name would be the San Jose graticule. -- Ebrowne (talk) 20:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Not sure what's meant by this last anonymous edit: "Authorities have been alerted, and will arrest anyone caught on the property." considering the date 05-26 is in the past and I'm not aware that anyone tried to reach those coordinates on Monday. Maybe someone has misinterpreted the rules of this whole thing and thinks we're going to revisit past coordinates... well we could of course, but it's not likely.
I'm removing this, I think the general guideline of "no trespassing on private property" will do just fine, without retroactively threatening to arrest people.
