Difference between revisions of "2010-04-27 35 -80"

From Geohashing
imported>Ramblingwreck
(Created page with '<!-- If you did not specify these parameters in the template, please substitute appropriate things for IMAGE, LAT, LON, and DATE (YYYY-MM-DD format) [[Image:{{{image|IMAGE}}}|t…')
 
imported>Ramblingwreck
Line 6: Line 6:
 
-->
 
-->
 
{{meetup graticule  
 
{{meetup graticule  
| lat=34
+
| lat=35
 
| lon=-80
 
| lon=-80
 
| date=2010-04-28
 
| date=2010-04-28

Revision as of 23:57, 16 May 2010

Wed 28 Apr 2010 in 35,-80:
35.5255562, -80.8042341
geohashing.info google osm bing/os kml crox


Location

Charlotte, North Carolina. In a lot under development

Participants

  • Art was the only attendee.

Plans

Investigation of the tax records on the property showed that it was still owned by the developer. I contacted the number on the neighborhood's homepage to set up a meeting with a sales agent.

Expedition

Google Maps showed that the hashpoint was smack dab in the middle of a lot in a development in southwest Charlotte. I set up a meeting with a sales agent to view the property since I am looking for property in the area anyway, might as well look at property and geohash at the same time. Upon arriving at the development, I noticed that construction had stalled here and only one house had been started, the one on the opposite side of the neighborhood. I let the agent show me around the house that was way out of my price range and asked him if I could stop by lot one on my way out. He said sure so I drove to the lot, hopped out and ran to the center of the lot, protecting my phone from the rain. After I thought I had the point, I ran back to my car and drove home. After checking the traceroute, I realized that I had actually ran into lot 2 and not lot 1. All that trouble and nothing to show for it. I guess I'd better check my location better next time.

Achievements Earned

none.