Difference between revisions of "Talk:2014-10-16 41 -73"
From Geohashing
imported>LeslieHapablap |
imported>Palmpje |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Shouldn't it be reached? It was in the accuracy of the gps, that's usually all that counts... - [[User:RecentlyChanged|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User_talk:RecentlyChanged|talk]]) 07:20, 17 October 2014 (EDT) | *Shouldn't it be reached? It was in the accuracy of the gps, that's usually all that counts... - [[User:RecentlyChanged|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User_talk:RecentlyChanged|talk]]) 07:20, 17 October 2014 (EDT) | ||
: Right, didn't read the report carefully enough, sorry. --[[User:LeslieHapablap|LeslieHapablap]] ([[User talk:LeslieHapablap|talk]]) 07:21, 17 October 2014 (EDT) | : Right, didn't read the report carefully enough, sorry. --[[User:LeslieHapablap|LeslieHapablap]] ([[User talk:LeslieHapablap|talk]]) 07:21, 17 October 2014 (EDT) | ||
+ | : Hm, I would judge myself as not reached if I was sure the point was on the other side of the wall. In a field with liberty to wander about it's easier. [[User:Palmpje|Palmpje]] ([[User talk:Palmpje|talk]]) 14:01, 21 October 2014 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 18:01, 21 October 2014
Hey there, too bad it didn't work out, maybe next time ;) I took the liberty of adding the correct "Not reached" category to the report. Cheers! --LeslieHapablap (talk) 07:16, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
- Shouldn't it be reached? It was in the accuracy of the gps, that's usually all that counts... - RecentlyChanged (talk) 07:20, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
- Right, didn't read the report carefully enough, sorry. --LeslieHapablap (talk) 07:21, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
- Hm, I would judge myself as not reached if I was sure the point was on the other side of the wall. In a field with liberty to wander about it's easier. Palmpje (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2014 (EDT)