Difference between revisions of "Talk:2016-11-04 42 -78"
From Geohashing
imported>Pedalpusher (comments!) |
imported>NWoodruff |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Thanks! It was taking forever as we have a ridiculously tiny sliver of Livingston County in the east and the hash-gods seems to not like the little section of Canada in the Northwest for the Buffalo Graticule. It was quite the challenging ribbon to acquire. I can only imagine the difficulty with 21 counties to try for. [[User:Pedalpusher|Pedalpusher]] ([[User talk:Pedalpusher|talk]]) 15:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC) | :Thanks! It was taking forever as we have a ridiculously tiny sliver of Livingston County in the east and the hash-gods seems to not like the little section of Canada in the Northwest for the Buffalo Graticule. It was quite the challenging ribbon to acquire. I can only imagine the difficulty with 21 counties to try for. [[User:Pedalpusher|Pedalpusher]] ([[User talk:Pedalpusher|talk]]) 15:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I had the same problem with [[2010-12-17_33_-84|Polk County]]. Although [[2011-11-24_33_-84|Butts County]] was even a smaller part of the graticule was the final piece. --[[User:NWoodruff|NWoodruff]] ([[User talk:NWoodruff|talk]]) 15:25, 6 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:25, 6 November 2016
Congrats on your Reverse Regional Achievement! I though everyone had forgotten about this ribbion.--NWoodruff (talk) 14:15, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! It was taking forever as we have a ridiculously tiny sliver of Livingston County in the east and the hash-gods seems to not like the little section of Canada in the Northwest for the Buffalo Graticule. It was quite the challenging ribbon to acquire. I can only imagine the difficulty with 21 counties to try for. Pedalpusher (talk) 15:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- I had the same problem with Polk County. Although Butts County was even a smaller part of the graticule was the final piece. --NWoodruff (talk) 15:25, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
