Difference between revisions of "User talk:Thomcat"

From Geohashing
imported>Tjtrumpet2323
imported>Thomcat
m (cleaned up)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Having edited one quarter of our Three Graticule Tall state, I firmly intend to visit a geohash in each Graticule of our state - eventually. Going to be tough to catch those two coastal ones (Forks and the one south of it). Although the "Victoria" one contains a nub of Washington, I am going to call that one Canada and skip it for now.
 
Having edited one quarter of our Three Graticule Tall state, I firmly intend to visit a geohash in each Graticule of our state - eventually. Going to be tough to catch those two coastal ones (Forks and the one south of it). Although the "Victoria" one contains a nub of Washington, I am going to call that one Canada and skip it for now.
 
== Wikiedit Goals ==
 
 
I've completed the Active/Inactive for all the contintental categories except Europe, where I am about 15-20% done. I am actively watching North America for New pages to add them to the [[All Graticules]] page where necessary. (I also tend to add a map and other categories where necessary.)
 
 
The other project I am busy with is cleaning up the state/province and national categories for North America. Assuming this project goes well, we might invade Europe next. --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] 20:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 
  
 
------
 
------
Line 38: Line 32:
  
 
I think it's closer to 99.5% water.  :-) Since Jan 1st, the geohash has been on land 3 times, and twice it was wetland. On the other hand, a lot of people in the area own boats, so close-to-shore spots are fair game for weekend meet-ups. --[[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 15:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 
I think it's closer to 99.5% water.  :-) Since Jan 1st, the geohash has been on land 3 times, and twice it was wetland. On the other hand, a lot of people in the area own boats, so close-to-shore spots are fair game for weekend meet-ups. --[[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 15:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 
== Expedition Image Galleries ==
 
Please don't create blank galleries anymore as you did for [{{fullurl:Template:Expedition Images/2008-06-28|&oldid=29180}} 2008-06-28].  The template scripts consider whether or not a template ''exists'', not whether or not it has any displayable content.  I definitely appreciate the attempt to propagate the proper format with the comment lines; however, the way the templates are currently written, the responsibility of copying the underlying code lies on the first person to add an image for the day.  If you have any suggestions for improving this functionality, please direct them to [[Talk:Main Page]].  Thanks.  --[[User:Tjtrumpet2323|Tim P]] 20:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 15:24, 2 July 2008

Geohash Goals

Having edited one quarter of our Three Graticule Tall state, I firmly intend to visit a geohash in each Graticule of our state - eventually. Going to be tough to catch those two coastal ones (Forks and the one south of it). Although the "Victoria" one contains a nub of Washington, I am going to call that one Canada and skip it for now.



Oi!

Sorry I missed you at Cosmo's. One of these next times, though, for sure.--Nukewaste 02:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Good job on making the Active/Inactive graticule categories! I think it's awesome. Booberfish 05:31, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Categorization Scheme

(discussion moved to Category_talk:North_America)



Tyler hash

There was one in Tyler? Too bad I don't go to school near there anymore! --BenPop 00:35, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Categories

I know only about as much as you do, but I've tried something out, and left a message on the category page where you asked your question. AshleyMorton 14:42, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Cape May graticule

I think it's closer to 99.5% water.  :-) Since Jan 1st, the geohash has been on land 3 times, and twice it was wetland. On the other hand, a lot of people in the area own boats, so close-to-shore spots are fair game for weekend meet-ups. --Jevanyn 15:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)