Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sartakh"
imported>Thomcat (New page: == Categorization Scheme == Either heirarchy of (NA, US, state) is fine with me. The majority of pages had only NA, state, then a few others had US (instead of or added to NA), so I made ...) |
imported>Thomcat (→Categorization Scheme: reply, go for it!) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In hindsight, I agree that your proposal (each has US, state) would clean up the North America category considerably, and a similar thing could be done with Canadian provinces. Clean up would involve replacing NA with US on over 100 pages at this point, though. If you're still game, then I'll pitch in also. | In hindsight, I agree that your proposal (each has US, state) would clean up the North America category considerably, and a similar thing could be done with Canadian provinces. Clean up would involve replacing NA with US on over 100 pages at this point, though. If you're still game, then I'll pitch in also. | ||
--[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] 13:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] 13:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'll work on some states tonight. A similar thing could be done in Europe, which I am only about 15% through my task of categorizing Active/Inactive. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oceania might solve some of the problems of the New Zealanders and Australians have with being lumped as "Australasia" or the like. --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] 17:24, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:24, 16 June 2008
Categorization Scheme
Either heirarchy of (NA, US, state) is fine with me. The majority of pages had only NA, state, then a few others had US (instead of or added to NA), so I made them all the same (usually while doing other work).
In hindsight, I agree that your proposal (each has US, state) would clean up the North America category considerably, and a similar thing could be done with Canadian provinces. Clean up would involve replacing NA with US on over 100 pages at this point, though. If you're still game, then I'll pitch in also. --Thomcat 13:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
I'll work on some states tonight. A similar thing could be done in Europe, which I am only about 15% through my task of categorizing Active/Inactive.
Oceania might solve some of the problems of the New Zealanders and Australians have with being lumped as "Australasia" or the like. --Thomcat 17:24, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
