Difference between revisions of "Talk:Graticuleader achievement"
From Geohashing
(→Discussion) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''Support''' for the achievement itself, but the page needs work on clarity and generally tidying things up, which can be done once it becomes an achievement. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 19:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | '''Support''' for the achievement itself, but the page needs work on clarity and generally tidying things up, which can be done once it becomes an achievement. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 19:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
* '''Support''' --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 20:56, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | * '''Support''' --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 20:56, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *'''Needs Work''' - I like the concept, but I don't think it's possible at the moment to view, on the wiki, a geohasher's total coordinates reached/expeditions per graticule. You have to go elsewhere, like geohashing.win. If tables similar to at [[Most_active_Geohashers]], but limited to a single graticule, could be able to be created and posted to each graticule's page so it's easy to keep track of the relevant stats then this would work. A related issue that I have been thinking about and also I think needs to be addressed before this achievement goes live, is the issue of unsuccessful expeditions to a hash that others sucessfully reach. For example, [[User:Lachie|Lachie]] did not make it to [[2024-07-02_-37_144|this hash]], but as far as I'm aware, the stats gathering system would credit him with a success, as he is tagged as a participant on a hashpage labelled "coordinates reached". I'm sure this is solvable, but I'm not sure of the best approach. [[User:Johnwrw|Johnwrw]] ([[User talk:Johnwrw|talk]]) 00:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:55, 15 July 2024
This is a proposal made on 2024-07-11. Please leave comments and suggestions below, indicating whether you:
- Support the proposal
- Do not oppose it
- Oppose (this option requires you to watch the page and return to comment on modifications), or
- Think it Needs work before you can decide.
See Proposed achievements for more information on this process.
Discussion
Support for the achievement itself, but the page needs work on clarity and generally tidying things up, which can be done once it becomes an achievement. --KerrMcF (talk) 19:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Needs Work - I like the concept, but I don't think it's possible at the moment to view, on the wiki, a geohasher's total coordinates reached/expeditions per graticule. You have to go elsewhere, like geohashing.win. If tables similar to at Most_active_Geohashers, but limited to a single graticule, could be able to be created and posted to each graticule's page so it's easy to keep track of the relevant stats then this would work. A related issue that I have been thinking about and also I think needs to be addressed before this achievement goes live, is the issue of unsuccessful expeditions to a hash that others sucessfully reach. For example, Lachie did not make it to this hash, but as far as I'm aware, the stats gathering system would credit him with a success, as he is tagged as a participant on a hashpage labelled "coordinates reached". I'm sure this is solvable, but I'm not sure of the best approach. Johnwrw (talk) 00:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
