Difference between revisions of "Talk:Graticuleader achievement"
From Geohashing
(→Discussion) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
= Discussion = | = Discussion = | ||
| − | '''Support''' for the achievement itself, but the page needs work on clarity and generally tidying things up, which can be done once it becomes an achievement. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 19:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | + | *'''Support''' for the achievement itself, but the page needs work on clarity and generally tidying things up, which can be done once it becomes an achievement. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 19:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC) |
| + | |||
* '''Support''' --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 20:56, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | * '''Support''' --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 20:56, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
*Valid points by Johnwrw above, but I still '''support''' the achievements even without those changes. Also, alternative name suggestions are appreciated; I like Graticuleader but suggested it mostly as a joke, there might be a cleverer name. --[[User:Π π π|π π π]] ([[User talk:Π π π|talk]]) 12:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC) | *Valid points by Johnwrw above, but I still '''support''' the achievements even without those changes. Also, alternative name suggestions are appreciated; I like Graticuleader but suggested it mostly as a joke, there might be a cleverer name. --[[User:Π π π|π π π]] ([[User talk:Π π π|talk]]) 12:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | **For what it's worth, I think the Graticuleader name works really well. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 15:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:21, 18 July 2024
This is a proposal made on 2024-07-11. Please leave comments and suggestions below, indicating your thoughts on the proposal, including:
- Support - you think this proposal should be added with zero or minor changes
- Do not oppose - you think it's boring/meh/not for you, but it wouldn't harm to have it created
- Oppose - you have a specific reason as to why this ribbon should not exist (state this reasoning in your comment)
- Needs work - you think the achievement should be created after more significant changes have been made
See Proposed achievements for more information on this process.
Discussion
- Support for the achievement itself, but the page needs work on clarity and generally tidying things up, which can be done once it becomes an achievement. --KerrMcF (talk) 19:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Needs Work - I like the concept, but I don't think it's possible at the moment to view, on the wiki, a geohasher's total coordinates reached/expeditions per graticule. You have to go elsewhere, like geohashing.win. If tables similar to at Most_active_Geohashers, but limited to a single graticule, could be able to be created and posted to each graticule's page so it's easy to keep track of the relevant stats then this would work. A related issue that I have been thinking about and also I think needs to be addressed before this achievement goes live, is the issue of unsuccessful expeditions to a hash that others sucessfully reach. For example, Lachie did not make it to this hash, but as far as I'm aware, the stats gathering system would credit him with a success, as he is tagged as a participant on a hashpage labelled "coordinates reached". I'm sure this is solvable, but I'm not sure of the best approach. Johnwrw (talk) 00:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
