Talk:Geohashing Day 2011 Extravaganza
From Geohashing
Revision as of 12:06, 11 January 2011 by imported>Crox
Voting system
Now that I re-read the rules and thought about it I see that the voting system may be all shiny and geeky but I see some flaws in the setup.
- IMHO, a large GH meetup should rather try to be large than to be epic but small. I have a certain feeling that this system will result in an epic fail of a small group.
- Please add information how unrated options are counted. Worst/best/don't care? Because people seem to only rate locations they might like, which in case of "don't care" would effectively put the lower rated below the unrated.
- Please allow to change votes
I'm tempted to add more locations only to break the ban of reconsidering. --Ekorren 06:38, 11 January 2011 (EST)
- I agree with you on the large vs epic issue. But I guess this choice is part of everyone's vote. (Ideally it should be large and epic!) If by "fail" you mean "risk that we fail to reach the coordinates", I think it's not a big deal, as long as we have fun doing an expedition with a bunch of incredible people. If you mean "only a small group" I think it's not an issue neither, since if we assume that people will vote for a place where they would be likely to attend, the one with the most votes should be the one with the largest group. Of course if a lot of people who do not plan to attend in any case vote it could be different.
- The ranking system is described here. But I haven't studied it yet so I can't answer your question. (and hence I haven't voted yet :o)
- I guess you could add "Himalayas" as option "I" and revote.
- --Crox 07:06, 11 January 2011 (EST)
