Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Graticules by feature"

From Geohashing
imported>Danatar
(New page: I started naming all-water graticules on the "All Graticules" page the way "name of water body lat, lon" (e.g. Mediterranean Sea 39, 7). When a page for such a graticule is created (where...)
 
imported>ReletBot
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 18:04, 4 April 2009

I started naming all-water graticules on the "All Graticules" page the way "name of water body lat, lon" (e.g. Mediterranean Sea 39, 7). When a page for such a graticule is created (where are all the water and air geohashers?), it should be put into the appropriate category. This will lead to an increase in categories in "Category:Graticules by Feature", so perhaps there should be "Category:All-water Graticules" to place them in, what do you think? Large ocean/sea names should be preferred over small bay one's, but for me e.g. the Mediterranean Sea and North Sea graticules just shouldn't be named "Atlantic Ocean lat, lon" although they are technically part of it (see marginal sea and mediterranean sea). But I put the Tyrrhenian Sea into Mediterranean Sea because it is so small.

Category:Graticules by Feature

Category:All-water Graticules
Category:Atlantic Ocean
Atlantic Ocean 64, 6
Category:Baltic Sea
Category:Caribbean Sea
Category:Mediterranean Sea
Mediterranean Sea 39, 7
Category:North Sea
Category:Pacific Ocean

OR, if marginal seas are considered a subcategory:

Category:Graticules by Feature

Category:All-water Graticules
Category:Atlantic Ocean
Atlantic Ocean 64, 6
Category:Caribbean Sea
Category:North Sea
Category:Baltic Sea
Category:Mediterranean Sea
Mediterranean Sea 39, 7
Category:Pacific Ocean

and so on. Danatar 10:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)