Difference between revisions of "Talk:Citation Needed achievement"
(Adding thoughts to proposed achievements) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:Needs discussion]] | [[Category:Needs discussion]] | ||
| Line 6: | Line 4: | ||
'''Needs Work''' regarding the criteria; it's overly specific and oddly exclusive. Why does the photo ''need'' to have your hand touching the sign? Why do all participants ''need'' to travel as a group? Surely if all of them are at the point when the sign is also there, they should succeed. Also, I don't see any reason for a distinct achievement for something as specific as this, but I would not oppose the proposal purely because of this. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 02:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC) | '''Needs Work''' regarding the criteria; it's overly specific and oddly exclusive. Why does the photo ''need'' to have your hand touching the sign? Why do all participants ''need'' to travel as a group? Surely if all of them are at the point when the sign is also there, they should succeed. Also, I don't see any reason for a distinct achievement for something as specific as this, but I would not oppose the proposal purely because of this. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 02:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *'''Oppose''' it does not really add anything interesting or new. --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 15:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:16, 3 April 2024
Do not oppose. It's just another take something with you and do something with it at the hash achievement, of which there are already a few. I would prefer that displaying the sign on the way to/from the hash be a requirement. --PeterRoder (talk) 14:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Needs Work regarding the criteria; it's overly specific and oddly exclusive. Why does the photo need to have your hand touching the sign? Why do all participants need to travel as a group? Surely if all of them are at the point when the sign is also there, they should succeed. Also, I don't see any reason for a distinct achievement for something as specific as this, but I would not oppose the proposal purely because of this. --KerrMcF (talk) 02:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
