Difference between revisions of "Talk:San Jose, California"
From Geohashing
imported>Ted (→Where are you guys getting your coordinates?!) |
imported>Ted (removed question for which the answer was: operator malfunction) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Considering this graticule covers more than half of the South Bay, including San Jose (largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area, 3rd largest in the state, 10th largest in the country), I think a better name would be the San Jose graticule. -- ''[[User:Ebrowne|<font color="Blue">Ebrowne</font>]] ([[User talk:Ebrowne|<font color="Blue" size="1">talk</font>]]) 20:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | Considering this graticule covers more than half of the South Bay, including San Jose (largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area, 3rd largest in the state, 10th largest in the country), I think a better name would be the San Jose graticule. -- ''[[User:Ebrowne|<font color="Blue">Ebrowne</font>]] ([[User talk:Ebrowne|<font color="Blue" size="1">talk</font>]]) 20:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 17:51, 25 May 2008
I don't think East Bay is a good name for this graticule. Most of what I consider to be the East Bay (Oakland, Hayward, Union City, half of Fremont) are in the San Francisco graticule. This graticule does cover the Contra Costa Valley, but that's not as East Bay as Oakland.
Considering this graticule covers more than half of the South Bay, including San Jose (largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area, 3rd largest in the state, 10th largest in the country), I think a better name would be the San Jose graticule. -- Ebrowne (talk) 20:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
